<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodd-Frank: SEC Whistleblower Facelift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schulzkelaw.com/dodd-frank-sec-whistleblower-facelift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schulzkelaw.com/dodd-frank-sec-whistleblower-facelift/</link>
	<description>Legal, negotiation and tax counsel for business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd-Frank &#38; SEC Whistleblowers: What&#8217;s in it for you? — Whistleblower Central</title>
		<link>http://schulzkelaw.com/dodd-frank-sec-whistleblower-facelift/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd-Frank &#38; SEC Whistleblowers: What&#8217;s in it for you? — Whistleblower Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schulzkelaw.com/?p=960#comment-132</guid>
		<description>[...] *Cross-posted at The Schulzke Brief. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *Cross-posted at The Schulzke Brief. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd-Frank bill now before the Senate — Whistleblower Central</title>
		<link>http://schulzkelaw.com/dodd-frank-sec-whistleblower-facelift/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd-Frank bill now before the Senate — Whistleblower Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schulzkelaw.com/?p=960#comment-131</guid>
		<description>[...] and &#8220;Consumer Protection&#8221; have disappeared from the bill&#8217;s title.  My brief analysis of the securities whistleblower provisions, in Act Section 922, tells me that once the bill is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and &#8220;Consumer Protection&#8221; have disappeared from the bill&#8217;s title.  My brief analysis of the securities whistleblower provisions, in Act Section 922, tells me that once the bill is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd-Frank H.R. 4173 now before the Senate — The Schulzke Brief</title>
		<link>http://schulzkelaw.com/dodd-frank-sec-whistleblower-facelift/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd-Frank H.R. 4173 now before the Senate — The Schulzke Brief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schulzkelaw.com/?p=960#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] and &#8220;Consumer Protection&#8221; have disappeared from the bill&#8217;s title.  My brief analysis of the securities whistleblower provisions, in Act Section 922, tells me that once the bill is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and &#8220;Consumer Protection&#8221; have disappeared from the bill&#8217;s title.  My brief analysis of the securities whistleblower provisions, in Act Section 922, tells me that once the bill is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

